Middle Class Christianity
During yesterday’s sermon I talked about the opportunity the homosexuality “issue” affords us to reflect upon key Christian concepts like salvation, grace, repentance, love and judgment. Because of our sometimes narrow and even distorted understanding of these words, we may be ill-equipped to think about, much less talk about a complex issue like homosexuality.
Take the word “judgment,” for example. Since I’ve moved to the northeast, I would have to say that if there is one sin that most people assume is the unforgivable sin, it’s judging. I pointed out yesterday that judging is as essential and inevitable as breathing. Even saying that we shouldn’t judge is itself a judgment. One cannot not judge. We are all constantly judging what’s right or wrong, what’s appropriate or inappropriate, what’s helpful or unhelpful. We judge our own behavior, and we judge other people’s behavior. (Evaluating other people’s behavior is partly how we judge how we’re going to act.) Jesus said, “For judgment I came into this world.” Paul tells the Corinthian church,
Do you not know that the saints will judge the world? And if you are to judge the world, are you not competent to judge trivial cases? Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of this life! Therefore, if you have disputes about such matters, appoint as judges even men of little account in the church! I say this to shame you (I Corinthians 6:2-4).
As far as the Corinthian church is concerned, Christians were failing to address issues like incest, prostitution and believers taking each other to court. Paul said that Christians who engaged in such practices were making a mockery of Christian freedom.
The critical distinction we often fail to make is between judging and being judgmental, or between judging and condemning, or between critiquing and being critical. I won’t repeat all the examples I gave yesterday. (If you haven’t heard yesterday’s sermon, you can find it at http://www.switchpod.com/users/bellref/feed.xml.) I’ll be giving a couple more examples next week.
Is homosexual practice a sin? Some people would respond with, “Who am I to judge?” If what we mean is, “Who am I to condemn?” then I would say, “Exactly.” But if what we’re meaning is, “It’s not my job to decide what’s right or wrong for another human being,” then I would have to say, “Actually, that is your responsibility, especially if that person is part of your “body,” or what the New Testament calls “the body of Christ.” Otherwise Paul’s counsel to the Galatians would be meaningless: “Brothers and sisters, if someone is caught in a sin, you who are spiritual should restore them gently. But watch yourself, or you also may be tempted” (6:1). We name and address sin in ourselves and others not in order to condemn but to restore. There is judgment that seeks to wound and condemn, and then there is the judgment that seeks to illumine and heal.
One of the things we judge is the significance or weight of a particular sin. We know that all of us are works in progress, and it isn’t our business to address any and every sin in each other’s lives. What we address, and how we choose to address it, also requires judgment; hopefully wise, Spirit-led judgment. Again, deciding not to address an issue or to even think about it is itself a judgment. We cannot not judge.
I’m not saying at this point that homosexual practice is a sin. I’m just saying that we shoot ourselves in the foot and reneg on our responsibility if we throw up our hands and say, “Who am I to judge?”, and then turn around and judge (even to the point of condemning) others who are trying to take this biblically-mandated responsibility seriously.
Another word that is often misunderstood is “suffering.” I’m not going to say very much about this now, but I do want to point out that the New Testament assumes that all of us are going to suffer. Suffering is a part of everyone’s life, and for believers, there is the additional suffering that comes because we have decided to follow Jesus. Sometimes people suffer just because they are Christians. Recently, I read an article by a former Muslim whose life has been pretty miserable since becoming a Christian. Sometimes people suffer for their moral stances. Dietrick Bonhoeffer suffered imprisonment and ultimately death for taking a stand against the immoral Nazi regime. Last week I read an article about a lesbian woman who began her own gay rights magazine and was a leader in the gay rights movement, but then left all that behind when she gave her life to Christ. In the article, she was honest about her struggles. She has been spurned by her gay friends, has gone through a crisis of faith, and has mixed feelings about her experiences with the evangelical community.
All of us live in a Christian culture that I sometimes refer to as “middle class Christianity,” which has less to do with our particular standard of living than a mentality or ethos that focusses on personal fulfillment and a sense of entitlement. We are entitled to receiving a certain level of income, to being married, to being happily married, to having a family, to having a rewarding job, to being healthy, to being part of an exciting church…and the list goes on. We assume that whatever we lack in any of these areas is temporary and that God will come through for us in the end. What this means is that we’re not very good at suffering. We’re not very interested in learning how to do it, because we just want it to go away, and we’ll just wait and pray until it does — but thank you anyway.
No wonder we have so little to offer people who suffer because of same sex attraction. It’s so much easier to say, “Let’s just change the rules, shall we?” My point here is not to say that homosexual practice is wrong. I’m just saying that we are ill-equipped to talk about this issue because of our less-than-biblical understanding of words like “judging” and “suffering.” This is true of people on both the right and the left. People on the left are saying, “We just need to change the rules,” while believers on the extreme right are saying, “You just need to let us pray for you, and you won’t feel these desires anymore.” None of us does suffering very well.
Thing is, middle class Christianity isn’t biblical Christianity. I was born and raised in a middle class Christian world. Because of some middle class Christian assumptions, I’ve made some serious mistakes in my life, mistakes that I deeply regret. How have I changed? (To the extent that I have changed.) Spending time in the Scriptures, especially the New Testament, has been key. It’s a different world, and a different worldview. For me it takes reading long passages of Scripture in a single setting. Only then do I seem to get a “feel” for what life in the kingdom of God is really supposed to be like.
Yesterday I said that many people who say they like Jesus but don’t like Paul, haven’t read Jesus. They haven’t spend any extended time in the gospels. Actually, Jesus is harder to understand, harder on people and harsher in his tone at times than Paul. It was Jesus who said, “If any want to follow me, you will need to take up your cross daily and follow me.” You see, it’s not a matter of whether we’ll have to take up a cross, it’s what cross we’ll have to take up.
A basic gospel principle is that all suffering can become a gift, even if it doesn’t start out that way. Even if it’s caused by the devil, God can redeem it. It can be turned into a gift. It can become a blessing. This is the gospel, the good news; that something as evil and horrible as the day Jesus died could become “Good Friday.”
Henri Nouwen is arguably the best known spiritual writer of the last half-century. I’ve included several of Nouwen’s quotes on this blog. Nouwen was a Catholic priest whose career included teaching at Yale and Harvard, and who chose to spend the last years of his life living with the mentally disabled at a Christian community called L’Arche. What most people don’t know is that Nouwen’s sexual orientation was homosexual. This didn’t become public knowledge until after his death. For many of us, discovering this about Nouwen illumined the the intense pain and loneliness that lies just below the surface in so many of his writings. One wonders if Nouwen could have written with such spiritual depth and insight without this particular suffering. We know that Nouwen struggled with bouts of depression, once to the point of having to be hospitalized. Yet, what a fruitful life and ministry, a life that has touched millions of other lives.
Sometimes our best friends aren’t those who respond to our suffering in a knee-jerk way by trying to make it go away. Instead they point us to that biblical world, that kingdom world, where suffering can be redeemed and become fruitful. Nouwen himself wrote:
Sometimes our sorrow overwhelms us so much that we no longer can believe in joy. Life just seems a cup filled to the brim with war, violence, rejection, loneliness, and endless disappointments. At times like this we need our friends to remind us that crushed grapes can produce tasty wine. It might be hard for us to trust that any joy can come from our sorrow, but when we start taking steps in the direction of our friends’ advice, even when we ourselves are not yet able to feel the truth of what they say, the joy that seemed to be lost may be found again and our sorrow may become livable.
Just as Nouwen’s struggles with his sexual identity produced spiritual insights that have blessed many, many people, I pray that our own struggle to understand issues around sexual identity may lead to insights that will inform and enrich all of our spiritual lives.
April 14, 2008 at 8:14 pm
I’ve been thinking of yesterday’s sermon I heard on the way to work this morning, and today’s blog. There are many people who struggle with their sexuality. I ask myself are Men gay because of a longing for love or emptiness they did not receive from a strong male figure in their life as they were growing up? Or are women gay because they feel they cannot be loved by a man because of their childhood, or sexual abuse from a male or bad relationship with a man? I do not think you are born gay that is just ridiculous, that’s like questioning Is what God created not perfect. In my own life I know what if feels like when people JUDGE or CONDEMN you when they say you are no good for nothing, or you should not have been born, by people in my own household no less. I’m not looking for anyone’s sympathy I just know from pesonal experience what that feels like. Iv’e also seen things as a child nobody should ever have to see. I never felt I should be gay as a result but might have thought about it once or twice and also had friends as young as the fifth grade confused of their sexuality that were going through similar trials in there own life’s. I think the society we live in can also play a part in people being confused of there sexuality, with the idea of gay marriages, or gay shows or commercials with even children starring in these types of shows. So what are we showing our young generation. I shut my cable off a year ago because of a gay commercial I saw on nickelodeon. As I said on the last blog I know a lot of people who are gay, and some I’m very close with, and some who shared their story with me and I only hope and pray that what I say and do can be an influence of Jesus to them and be there when they need me… Thank you Pastor for your strength to talk about this issue no matter how small or big it may be or seem to be..
April 14, 2008 at 8:28 pm
I wonder if the film “For the Bible Tells Me So” which is playing at Proctors Theater this week on Wed and Thurs might be useful for some people to help in the discussion about the Bible and the issue of homosexuality. I plan to see it on Wed evening.
April 15, 2008 at 9:25 am
“Ryjuem”, thanks for the reminder about the film at Proctors. I hope to see the film this week. If others see the film, I hope you don’t mind my giving you a heads up about a couple of things. First, having seen the trailer for the film, I want to encourage you to remember the distinction between judging and condemning. This film is going to highlight the ways many Christians have “condemned” gays and lesbians. These attitudes deserve to be highlighted. Something is very wrong, to the point of being evil, about how gays and lesbians have often been treated by many Christians. I’m not looking forward to seeing these attitudes and actions exhibited on film, but I think we need to see them. If the film helps the Christian community look in the mirror and take the log out of its own eye, then that’s a good thing. It’s also important to understand why practicing as well as non-practicing gays and lesbians often feel negatively toward the church. To put it bluntly, we have a lot of repenting to do.
Since the title of the movie is “The Bible Tells Me So,” I’m assuming that the movie will be looking at different ways the biblical passages about homosexuality can be read. I don’t want to be presumptuous, but I’m guessing that you’re going to be given a piece of information that is actually misinformation. People in the film are probably going to say the same-sex behavior that is prohibited in the Bible doesn’t apply to people with a homosexual orientation, but rather to heterosexuals engaging in homosexual acts. The basis for this argument is the assumption that Paul and all the biblical authors before him didn’t know about homosexuality as an orientation.
One of the people interviewed in the film, Rev. Dr. Mel White, heads an organization called “Soulforce.” Recently, local RCA pastors were encouraged to download a document from this organization called “What the Bible Says – and Doesn’t Say – about Homosexuality.” This document states that the reason the Bible is silent on the issue of homosexual orientation is because “homosexual orientation wasn’t even known until the 19th century.” Often people on the left accuse people on the right of using out-dated science when talking about this issue (which is often true). Unfortunately, people on the left are guilty of using out-dated research about ancient views related to homosexual behavior. N.T Wright, who is a classicist by training, talks about how literature in the first century contains all the nuances about homosexual behavior that are part of our discussions today. For example, Plato’s Symposium contains references to men who have experienced same-sex attraction since birth. People floated any number of “medical” theories about how such folks came to be this way, just as we are doing today.
About 30 years ago, I remember reading a book by John Boswell on ancient views about homosexuality. His views continue to influence gay and lesbian Christians today. Bernadette Brooten, a New Testament scholar who identifies herself as lesbian and has written extensively on lesbianism in antiquity, criticizes Boswell: “Boswell…argued that…’The early Christian church does not appear to have opposed homosexual behavior per se.’ The sources on female homoeroticism that I present in this book run absolutely counter to [this conclusion].”
Louis Compton, another strong advocate of homosexual unions, has written: “According to [one] interpretation, Paul’s words were not directed at ‘bona fide’ homosexuals in committed relationships. But such a reading, however well-intentioned, seems strained and unhistorical.” Robert Gagnon writes: “Many in the ancient world attributed one or more forms of homosexual practice to an interplay of nature and nurture; and, moreover, believed that homoerotic impulses could be very resistant to change.” Sounds pretty modern to me. I’m relaying this information because, in my experience, the assumption that ancients didn’t know about same-sex orientation is the primary basis for “alternative” interpretations of the biblical passages about homosexual behavior. My interest here is not in stacking the deck, just making sure we’re playing with a full deck when talking about what the Bible says or doesn’t say about same-sex attraction and behavior.
April 15, 2008 at 10:18 am
David, you raise a couple of important issues about how a person comes to experience same-sex attraction. Personally, I believe an objective reading of the research indicates that some combination of “nature and nuture” is usually at work. As far as whether God would create a person “not perfect,” actually none of us is born perfect. The Bible says that the “fall” and the “sin disease” has affected all of creation. In other words, everything is “broken,” in one way or another, not because God wants it to be, but because we live in a broken world. Sin has penetrated the very fabric of the physical world.
For example, God doesn’t want people to be born blind, but some are. God doesn’t want children to be born with deformities, but some are. God doesn’t want children to be born with autism, but some are. So it shouldn’t surprise us that our sexuality would be one area where we may be born “broken.”
Just as there are many factors that can influence someone becoming depressed, I think there are many factors that can influence someone becoming gay. I’ve met many gay men who seem to have been significantly influenced by a dysfunctional relationship with their father. I also know many lesbian women who have been sexually abused. One friend of ours tells us that when she was living a lesbian lifestyle, every lesbian she met [in a major U.S. city] had been sexually abused. I hasten to add that I know lesbians who do not appear to have been abused, and I know of gay men who seem to have had very good relationships with their fathers.
I wouldn’t be surprised if a very small number of men and women are hard-wired to be gay or lesbian from birth. On the other hand, it would take a whole lot of blind faith for me to believe this is their “gift” from God. Like with many issues, the simplest solution is often the best solution. We’re all born broken. None of us comes into this world perfect, including and maybe especially in the area of our sexuality.
I also believe it’s possible to become gay primarily because of environmental factors. I know of one man who didn’t experience same-sex attraction until he was sexually abused by an older man. At some point along the way, our personal choices can probably also influence the future direction of our sexual orientation and relating. I also believe that, like in many other areas, spiritual forces (i.e. the demonic) can play a part. Of course, all of these influences play a role in many areas of our lives. As I see it, modern science actually supports the biblical view of sin, which is multi-dimensional and very complex.
While it is important to reflect upon how we’ve come to be the way we are, the more important question is where we go from here. That’s the primary issue Jesus and others in the New Testament are concerned with. Whatever we were born with, whatever nurture we received or failed to receive along the way, how do we inch our way toward the “New Creation,” the seeds of which were planted already when we were born again in Christ? Even though we’re never completely “cured” of the sin disease and its effects on our hearts, minds and bodies, is it possible to gradually live lives that point in the direction of the New Creation? These, for me, are the most important and most exciting questions for us to be asking, because they affect ALL of our lives.
April 29, 2008 at 6:16 pm
I just want to ask, did Jesus ever say anything about this issue? I do not think He did and I believe that says a lot.
April 30, 2008 at 9:22 am
Beth, you raise an interesting point. No, Jesus didn’t say anything directly about homosexual practice. The only problem with any “argument from silence” is interpreting what the silence means. Some people argue that this means Jesus assumed and accepted the existing prohibition against homosexual practice. If he believed things should change, they say, then he would have certainly said so. Others suggest that Jesus’ silence reflects his indifference regarding the issue, i.e. it just wasn’t a big deal to him. My own take on this is that Jesus wouldn’t have addressed this issue simply because it WASN’T an issue in first century Palestine. There were no (openly) practicing homosexual relationships. A rabbinic saying from the period says that it is okay for men to sleep under the same cloak together because “Israel is not suspected”; that is, homosexual practice was unknown among Jews of the time.
On the other hand, when Jesus addressed the issue of divorce (which WAS a hot button issue at the time), he referred back to Genesis 1:27: “Haven’t you read that at the beginning the Creator ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one.” Some would argue that in this passage Jesus is affirming the male/female nature of marriage. Since homosexuality isn’t the issue Jesus is addressing here, this may not be the strongest argument. Going back to the argument from silence, Jesus never addressed the issue of incest, pederasty or bestiality either, but contemporary Jews would have assumed that these were all included when he talked about “sexual immorality,” just as they would have assumed that homosexual practice was included. Another interesting passage to consider is Matthew 19:10-12, where Jesus talks about the different reasons people are “eunuchs:” “For some are eunuchs because they were born that way; others were made that way by men; and others have renounced marriage because of the kingdom of heaven. The one who can accept this should accept it.” Clearly Jesus isn’t restricting his teaching to those who are literally “eunuchs.” He does seem to be talking about the different reasons people may find themselves having to live single or celibate lives. None of this provides conclusive evidence one way or the other regarding what Jesus thought about homosexual practice, but it seems to me that the circumstantial evidence may point to his assuming and supporting current Jewish views on the matter.